ѻýҕl

<ѻýҕl class="page_title">Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
<ѻýҕl>
MedpageToday

Systemic Corticosteroids for Urticaria: How Safe? How Effective?

<ѻýҕl class="dek">—While second-generation H1-antihistamines are standard therapy for both acute and chronic urticaria, some patients need additional treatment to find relief. A new study investigates whether short-course systemic corticosteroids are the answer.

Urticaria, a condition characterized by wheals and/or angioedema, is usually short-lived, lasting less than 6 weeks for most patients. In the chronic form of the disease, the course lasts greater than 6 weeks and may be either spontaneous or physically induced by factors such as pressure or extreme cold.1

For chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) sufferers, an increased dose of a first-line, second-generation H1-antihistamine may be tried.1 Another option for treatment in these cases is a short course of a systemic corticosteroid—such as prednisone or dexamethasone. However, according to the investigators of a newly published systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of systemic corticosteroids for urticaria, the evidence hasn’t been adequately characterized.2

image

The benefits (and risks) of adding corticosteroids

To help fill this knowledge gap, an international team led bv Xiajing Chu, MPH, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, reviewed the benefits and harms of treatment with or without systemic corticosteroids for both acute and chronic urticaria flares by looking at 12 randomized trials that included 944 patients.2 The investigators conducted random-effects meta-analyses of urticaria activity, itch severity, and adverse events as part of a guideline update to the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI)/American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (ACAAI) Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters for Chronic Urticaria. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.

After reviewing the evidence, the investigators found that the use of add-on systemic corticosteroids was likely to improve urticaria activity by a 14% to 15% absolute difference among patients with low or moderate probability (17.5% to 64.0%) to improve with antihistamines alone (odds ratio [OR] 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43 to 3.31; number needed to treat [NNT] 7; moderate certainty). The use of add-on systemic corticosteroids was likely to improve urticaria activity by a 2.2% absolute difference (NNT 45; moderate certainty) among those with a high chance (95.8%) to improve with antihistamines alone. While itch severity may be improved with the use of short-course corticosteroids (OR 2.44, 95% CI 0.87 to 6.83; risk difference 9%; NNT 11; low certainty), there’s also a good chance that adverse events will increase with these agents (OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.00 to 7.62; risk difference 15%; number needed to harm 9; moderate certainty). The most common adverse events reported were gastrointestinal discomfort and neuropsychiatric changes.

Large randomized trials are needed

“Among patients who are antihistamine responsive, systemic corticosteroids, such as prednisone or dexamethasone, likely provide little benefit,” says senior investigator Derek K. Chu, MD, PhD, The Research Institute of St. Joe’s Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. “Among those who are antihistamine refractory, benefits are modest. These are balanced, however, by systemic steroids increasing overall adverse effects. Thus, systemic corticosteroids for acute urticaria or chronic urticaria exacerbations likely improve urticaria, depending on antihistamine responsiveness, but also likely increase adverse effects by approximately 15%.”

Dr. Chu believes that there’s much that remains to be learned about the use of systemic corticosteroids in patients with urticaria, and that their future use may be muted by other treatment advances, such as those detailed in a new systematic review and meta-analysis.3

“We need large randomized trials addressing the role of systemic steroids for acute urticaria and flares of chronic urticaria to increase the certainty and precision of estimates, and inform about potential disease-modifying effects,” he says. “We also need better prediction tools for who will derive the greatest net benefit from a short course of systemic steroids. These may, however, be replaced by a growing number of new, rapidly acting medications for urticaria.”

Published:

Brett Moskowitz writes about medicine and, in 2008, founded Bowery Consulting, which specializes in the development of medical content for healthcare professionals.

References

image
Patient Reports: A Key Resource in Treating Chronic Skin Conditions
A new international study reports that awareness of patient-reported outcome measures is limited among healthcare providers who treat patients with atopic dermatitis and chronic urticaria. It’s surprising and concerning.
image
In CSU, Non-Dermal Conditions Impact Disease Control and Quality of Life
A recent study showed that up to one-third of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria had non-skin-related symptoms, and these are tied to increased disease activity, poorer disease control, and poorer quality of life.
image
Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Getting Patients to a Better Place
German investigators conducted an analysis of the patient experience in chronic spontaneous urticaria, identifying pitfalls and suggesting ways to improve care.
image
Patients with Chronic Urticaria Can Make ‘Smart’ Use of Their Phones
It’s not the kind of selfie that first comes to mind, but for patients with symptoms of chronic urticaria, photos of skin lesions taken with their smartphone before a first visit are valuable for treating clinicians, say the results of this report.
image
Skin Diseases Impair Quality of Life and Increase Stigmatization
The impact of skin diseases is not well understood in the general population among those who forgo clinical consultation. Approximately half of participants with one or more skin disease reported the condition to be quite or very embarrassing in both personal and work life, according to a large population-based survey.
image
Urticarial Vasculitis or Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria? Telling the Difference
Without clear guidelines and diagnostic criteria, clinicians have often been flying blind in attempting to distinguish between urticarial vasculitis (UV) and chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). A task force was convened to help clear up some of the confusion.